The Essay as Red-Headed Stepchild

October 17, 2011 § 18 Comments

Our guest blogger this morning is Ned Stuckey-French, author of The American Essay in the American Century, reacting to the National Book Awards:

In the foreword to his Selected Essays, E. B. White wrote that he was “not fooled about the place of the essay in twentieth-century American letters—it stands a short distance down the line. The essayist, unlike the novelist, the poet, and the playwright, must be content in his self-imposed role of second-class citizen” and should not dream of “the Nobel Prize or other earthly triumphs.”

Perhaps, but I prefer to think that the self-pity White is adopting here is mostly ironic.  By 1977, when he wrote this passage, he was seventy-eight years old, fabulously successful and as comfortable as a man who had battled depression all his life could be.

Nevertheless, he was onto something. There is a hierarchy of genres.

Last Thursday, October 7, we found out that the Swedish poet Tomas Tranströmer won this year’s Nobel Prize in Literature. He is undoubtedly a fine writer and I’m happy to be introduced to him and his work. Perhaps he’s even written some essays. Fine essayists have been awarded the Nobel Prize – Mann, Hemingway, Sartre, Camus, Paz, Lessing – but like the first winner, the French poet-essayist Sully Prudhomme, they were all known first and mainly for their work in another genre, usually fiction or poetry.

This week, the finalists for this year’s National Book Awards were announced, five in each of four categories.  These twenty books were selected from the 1,223 books their publishers had nominated. All of the finalists (indeed, all of the nominees) should feel honored, all of these books are great books, and readers interested in literature and good writing should buy them and read them. Four different panels of five judges select the finalists, and eventually the winner, in each category. My problem is not with the judges or the prizewinners, but with the categories.

The four categories of the National Book Awards are currently Fiction, Poetry, Young People’s Literature, and Nonfiction. Nonfiction is a biiiiiiiiiig category. I suspect short story writers may feel the same way about the Fiction category, for they know novels will, as they did again this year, dominate the category. (Edith Pearlman’s story collection, Binocular Vision, is up against four novels.)

Similar imbalances occur in the Nonfiction category. This year all of the National Book Award finalists in Nonfiction were biographies. Last year, Patti Smith’s wonderful memoir of her relationship with Robert Mapplethorpe, Just Kids, won over a biography, two books of history, and Megan Stack’s memoir of reporting on the war on terror. Some great essay collections, such as The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher (1975) by Lewis Thomas and United States: Essays 1952-1992 (1993) by Gore Vidal, have won in past years, but they have been the exception and they were always up against works of history, biography, and studies of science and current events (The 9/11 Commission Report was nominated in 2004). In the last decade or so, hardly any essay collections have been nominated. The few creative nonfiction slots have gone to memoirs. Religion scholar Carlos Eire’s memoir of growing up in Havana in the Fifties, Waiting for Snow in Havana: Confessions of a Cuban Boy, was nominated in 2003; Edwidge Danticat’s memoir of her father and uncle, Brother, I Am Dying, in 2007; and Joan Didion’s wrenching The Year of Magical Thinking won in 2005.

Pulitzer Prizes come in two main flavors: journalism and books. One would think that essayists might find an opening among the journalism awards, for they currently include thirteen different subcategories, but this hasn’t been the case. Even though essays appear first in general readership magazines, Sunday reviews, op-ed pages, and columns, essayists have not found a friendly subcategory among the Pulitzer awards for journalism. Russell Baker and Anna Quindlen did win Pulitzers for Commentary in 1979 and 1992 respectively, but that category has usually gone to political pundits or economic analysts such as Thomas Friedman (2002), Cynthia Tucker (2007), or David Leonhardt (2011). The Pulitzer journalism category of Criticism has been reserved almost exclusively for reviewers of book, television, music, and film reviews, but not cultural critics whose work might also be considered to be personal essays. Finally, the category Feature Writing has really meant feature reporting—investigations of murders, disasters and neglected communities, but nothing along the lines of the literary profiles of Gay Talese or the personal history of Sarah Vowell. Howell Raines’ remembrance of his family’s black housekeeper in 1992 is the one exception of the last two decades.

Like the National Book Awards, the Pulitzer Prizes for books has a single all-encompassing category: General Nonfiction. Renowned books of creative nonfiction have won in this category in the past including Norman Mailer’s Armies of the Night (1969), Annie Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek (1975), and Tracy Kidder’s The Soul of A New Machine (1982), but in recent years it has been dominated by political history.

The National Book Critics Circle currently offers prizes in Biography, Autobiography, Nonfiction and Criticism, but this hasn’t always been the case. Over the years the NBCC has shuffled their categories almost continuously. Until 2002 they had a Biography/Autobiography category, but it morphed into just Biography during 2003 and 2004 before splitting into two categories Biography and Autobiography/Memoir in 2005, though the second category has sometimes been called just Autobiography. Of the major awards, it has been the NBCC that has most often listed collections of essay among its finalists, but it has done this in the category of Criticism, not Nonfiction, which has almost always meant history. In Criticism, NBCC finalists and occasionally winners have included William H. Gass, Eudora Welty, Gore Vidal, Guy Davenport, Mary McCarthy and Cynthia Ozick, and more recently Gerald Early, Wayne Koestenbaum, Ander Monson and Lia Purpura. When personal essayists have won in the category of Criticism—as Eula Biss did with her beautiful and knotty Notes From No Man’s Land: American Essays in 2009—they have almost always done so against a field of traditional film, music, book or dance criticism.

The American Book Awards, established by the Before Columbus Foundation and administered by American Book Sellers Association, has named important memoirs unrecognized by the other more mainstream groups, including, among recent examples, Bich Minh Nguyen’s Short Girls and Neela Vaswani’s You Have Given Me a Country. Their selection process is unique. As they put it, “There are no categories, no nominees, and therefore no losers. The award winners range from well-known and established writers to under-recognized authors and first works.” This more open-ended approach has not, however, led them to recognize collections of personal essays any more regularly than the Pulitzer or National Book Award committees have.

E. B. White may have genuinely given up on the Nobel Prize, but I suspect, in his heart of hearts, he hoped to win a Pulitzer, National Book Award, or National Book Critics Circle Award. Ironically, he was a finalist only once, not for his Selected Essays, but for the Letters of E. B. White, edited by Dorothy Lobrano Guth, in 1976 for a National Book Critics Circle Award in Criticism. Our personal essayists do indeed stand “down the line,” as White put it. They should not. The personal essay should be more than the “fourth genre.” It is literary, possessed of a rich tradition, and full of unique possibilities. It deserves to be studied in literature as well as writing classes. It deserves anthologies that emphasize historical and cultural context, and promote extensive critical interpretation.  It deserves a diverse and expansive canon full of challenging essays that are read by general readers and scholars alike. And it deserves its own category among the major literary awards.


Ned Stuckey-French teaches essay-writing and modern American literature at Florida State University. He is the author of The American Essay in the American Century (University of Missouri Press, 2011) and, with Carl Klaus, is the editor of Essayists on the Essays: Montaigne to Our Time (forthcoming from the University of Iowa Press, March 2012).

Tagged: , , ,

§ 18 Responses to The Essay as Red-Headed Stepchild

  • […] Just a quick note to point out a wonderful guest blog post at the Brevity Blog by Ned Stuckey-French: The Essay as Red-Headed Stepchild. […]

  • Great piece, Ned. Thank you!

  • As an instructor of both creative nonfiction (writing) and contemporary American literature, I offer no literature without the personal essay and/or memoir for reasons you mention here (establishing creative nonfiction AS literature is imperative), but more and more for the ways in which twenty-first century students respond to them. In the age of Twitter and Facebook, websites and blogs, when the separation of writer/self and author/reader has been obliterated, students are hungry to see their authors on the page, and in no place is this more prominent than in the personal essay/memoir (metawriting, of course, being the exception). One of the distinctions, academically speaking, that intrigues (and frustrates) me is Norton’s separation of nonfiction from their INTRODUCTION TO LITERATURE anthology. They publish a (worthwhile) nonfiction anthology, THE NORTON READER, but as far as the literature anthology, it’s still the drama, fiction, and poetry show. Alas.

    I, too, quickly scan the nominations in various awards to see how “NONFICTION” has been defined vis a vis the current year’s nominees. And I long to see the essay collection, the memoir, the books I have read that I know to be worthy of such acclaim and honor.

    Thanks for the posting and the cogent and efficient run down–

  • Faye Snider says:

    You caught my attention right away with the E.B. White quote followed by your incredible ability to cite the details of how concrete categories affect the literary prizes. So much intriguing and interesting information! It does give pause yet challenges those of us who write essays to dig in, read broadly (there is so much in print) and to write the best we can.

  • Joe says:

    Good stuff, Ned. I, too, teach the intro to creative writing workshop as a lit course with workshop, and I lobbied to get Literary Nonfiction made a permanent course here at NIU. I’ve never understood the raised eyebrows at memoir/autobiography when it comes to awards (not that they should matter much). I’ve written biography and autobiography, and the origin point is the same: make a life matter, re-present the world in a meaningful way.

  • It would be wonderful to win accolades, but some of us writers realize that it is far more important to have our words read than to bow and thank people for an award.

  • James says:

    You make great points here, and I celebrate and support your conclusions. I suspect the essay, which so often exists between poetry and exposition, between journalism and fiction, has been left behind by publishing awards and teaching anthologies where categories are increasingly so crucial–and deadly. My students often come to the literary essay like some new found friend that lets them play around with everything they knew about writing.

    We need more publications to feature essays, create new anthologies (as you are doing Ned) and new spaces of conversation. I started a few years ago to promote literary and journalistic essays from small and independent journals from all over the world. Maybe we even need our own national essay awards, but then we might need to come up with categories.

  • mandylen says:

    I have an MFA in Creative Nonfiction, something that few programs offered when I started graduate school in 2003. I was one of Ned’s students and, while I already loved writing and reading essays, his course motivated me to formally change my focus from fiction to nonfiction. These days it seems creative nonfiction is increasing in popularity among writers and readers. The proliferation of reality television and the popularity of memoir and personal blogs seem to reflect an increasing desire for media that expresses experiences that are both authentic (True capital-T) and true to fact.

    I’m currently teaching in an English department that offers few opportunities for studying or teaching nonfiction. I’ve had to create my own 200-level course in creative nonfiction by co-opting a course called English 228: Literary and Cultural Studies. Giving creative nonfiction the same status in the English Department as we give to poetry, prose and drama seems like a good avenue for starting the conversation about the (very) long and rich tradition of the personal essay.

  • What should we essayists do, Ned? Fight for inclusion? Remain stoic and use the neglect to fuel our fervor for the form? Seek other (smaller) awards (PEN, Independent Publisher, etc.)? Accept defeat? Spread the word about great essays in our own grassroots ways?

  • I am grateful to Ned for his thorough historical overview and analysis. i didn’t know about everything covered in this post and it’s a relief to deal with some facts. Thanks, my friend.

  • Great critique of the literary prizes. This year I noticed, too, that “Best American Essays” (Edwidge Danticat is guest editor) has two pieces I’d call essays, the rest being memoir, feature magazine/journalism pieces, or short “anecdotes,” for lack of a better term. Zadie Smith’s piece in this collection is what I’d call an “essay” and it’s a fine one.

  • Anyone up for a review of the prizes of yesteryear…like last week’s bestsellers…and how they have stood the test of time and taste? I love prizes for writers but I am an anti-prizer because it distorts the reality for readers who really should take chances and make their own choices and decisions on the merits. It’s a little like having a personal shopper. Ugh.

  • Poet McFictiony says:

    Way to preach to the choir, Ned!

  • Sometimes you have to preach to the choir in order to consolidate the base.

    Pat asked what we might do. For starters, here is contact information for the awards committees, which, as I suggested, have been known to change their categories over the years. Write them, praise them for what they do, suggest an essay category, and send them the link to this link

    The National Book Critics Circle:

    Or, through their contact page at

    The National Book Awards:

    Pulitzer Prizes:

  • Julene Bair says:

    Thanks for getting this discussion going, Ned, and for all of the ammunition we can use to make the argument. Having just completed a book-length work and made my bow to the all-hallowed “narrative arc,” I am dropping back into the more organic form of the essay and loving it.

  • Bryan Adamson says:

    Good read Ned. Thank you. You taught me much here about the various awards and the whys of the categories. On another day, I’d be interested in learning from you why the essay has not been given its own standing by most of these awarding organizations, or has been more equitably considered.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The Essay as Red-Headed Stepchild at BREVITY's Nonfiction Blog.


%d bloggers like this: