AWP2014: The End of Long Form Reading?

February 27, 2014 § 5 Comments


awp seattleAn AWP Guest blog post from Daniel Wallace:

On this, the first day of AWP, I woke to find that a friend in India had posted to my Facebook wall another attack on creative writing by the infamous Anis Shivani. Shivani was asking if the great noise of the AWP conference masked a drought of great writing in the contemporary world. As I ran through crowded halls and down unmarked escalators, coffee spilling on my hand, searching for room “LL4,” being directed back the way I had come, learning that I had to follow the “blue carpet,” excusing my way through lines and lines of writers, I was sure of one thing, at least: there is a lot of noise at AWP, both outside and in me.

The panel “Teaching Brief, Sudden, Flash, and Very Short Prose” described many methods and benefits for teaching flash-length pieces to writing students. To Raul Moreno, brief prose offers a cognitive challenge suitable to undergraduate students’ actual writing skills, meeting them where they are. Sara Henning explained how she turns her own lessons into flash segments, forcing her students to speed up, pushing them to meet five minute deadlines, to write “shitty first drafts.” She suggested that brief prose provides a way past students’ technological dependencies and over-thinking anxieties. Meagan Cass argued for the use of poetry and short prose even in traditional fiction classes: such assignments better teach the skills that all teachers want their students to develop, from revision to risk-taking. Steve Pacheco talked about how he simply named cross-genre forms and required students to figure out, from that mystery, how they could enter new spaces of writing. Finally, Damian Dressick praised the sense of community that a flash classroom produces: students read more of each other’s work, see more pieces revised and developed, come to understand the sources of their classmates’ inspiration.

I loved the teaching lessons described by the panelists. But I questioned their picture of today’s reading world. All the panelists agreed that technological change has ended long-form reading and conventional narrative: our great-grandchildren, they seemed to imply, will find Twitter outrageously lengthy and verbose. But such a view seems to ignore the kind of reading young people apparently love to do: Twilight, Hunger Games, Harry Potter, books that are not simply long but come in multiple volumes. And what about House of Cards? Given the huge success of these long forms, these narratively dense and rewarding fictions, might the apparent chaos and chitter-chatter of the outside world, its bewildering technological acceleration, be merely a sign of our subjective alienation from it, not an actual diminishment of meaning and cohesion? Or is something even more complex at work?

Daniel Wallace is studying his PhD at the University of Tennessee. His first novel is represented by Inkwell Management. He was the Toni Brown scholarship winner to the 2012 Winter Getaway and has been a finalist in several writing contests. His work has appeared or is forthcoming in McSweeney’s, Tampa Review, Fiction Writers Review, and HTML Giant.

Tagged:

§ 5 Responses to AWP2014: The End of Long Form Reading?

  • nzumel says:

    Short form reading — flash pieces, tweets, top 10 lists, shorter blog posts — are good for reading in the interstices of your day: a five minute mental break between tasks, while you’re stuck on the phone waiting for “the next available operator.”

    And for longer stretches of time — some people spend that time reading, and they will read long form; some people spend their time doing something else. But it’s always been that way.

  • rbmoreno says:

    Thanks for the coverage of our panel, Daniel and Brevity! Here’s a brief response to Daniel’s (relevant, necessary) questions:

  • meagancass says:

    Hello Daniel!

    While I didn’t directly address your question during our session, as there wasn’t much time for the q&a and there were lots of hands raised, I didn’t mean to somehow agree that we’ve reached the end of the long form. I’ve found quite the opposite in my teaching, and of course Twiter and Facebook haven’t somehow caused human beings to have shorter attentions spans. Such arguments assume there was some golden age when people weren’t overworked and distractible. My students love and appreciate long stories. They love flash. They love Danielle Evans and Alice Munro, and they love Lydia Davis and Gary Lutz.

    Thanks,
    Meagan

  • Daniel Casey says:

    Reblogged this on Gently Read Literature.

  • jpon says:

    Excellent post, Daniel. As someone who writes novels and longer short stories, I do hope there’s room for both the short and long forms in the future of literature. Sometimes a story needs space to develop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading AWP2014: The End of Long Form Reading? at BREVITY's Nonfiction Blog.

meta

%d bloggers like this: