Be an Open Node: Blake Butler on Literary Citizenship
August 14, 2008 § 30 Comments
Blake Butler, fictionist, blogged in a most excellent fashion recently about the need to be a positive karmic force in the world of literary citizenship. What comes around, goes around, he reminds us. Here’s an excerpt and a link to the full (albeit, oddly titled) post:
Here are some ways you can do more, outside of spending $$$.
(1) When you read something you like, in any form, write the author and tell them. You don’t have to gush or take forever. Just tell them you saw it, you read it, you liked it. It’s a supportive feeling. It’s better than not saying anything.
(2) Write reviews of books you like. Short review/long review, whatever. It’s not that hard. It takes a little work to think about it clearly, but what goes around comes around. You can’t expect to be recognized for your work if you aren’t recognizing others for their work. Open the doors.
(3) Interview writers. New writers or well known writers. You like somebody’s work a lot? Ask to do an interview with them. It doesn’t take a ton of effort. Write up some questions. Let them talk. Spread the word. Talk. Say. Get. Eat.
I have done this for years and have made friends by doing it, have ‘opened doors’ so to speak: in other words, by helping others, you are also helping yourself. If spreading others’ work isn’t enough in your mind, think of it as ‘connections.’ (I hope you don’t have to think about it in this way to justify it because that is sad, but, well, some people…) Things often can/might happen as a result of these things, on both ends, even if they are just small things, small things add up, small things can be good things, haven’t you read Carver, momentum.
Energy. Power cock.
(4) If you have free time, start an online journal. Start a blog, a review, an anything. If you don’t know how I’ll help you. Say stuff. Mean what you say.
(5) If you have a journal already, respond faster. Pay attention to your inbox. When someone asks a question that feels dumb or unnecessary maybe, answer it anyway. Don’t be a fuck. Yeah, we’re all busy. Yeah, things take time. Work to take less time. It’s okay to move forward at a wicked pace. (And yes, as an editor, I too struggle to adhere to this advice, but I struggle at least, everyone struggles, but you can always struggle more. I am so tired of seeing journals with 200+ days response time, why do you even exist? Does it really take that long to like something? People should stop sending to these places. Seriously. Just stop sending.
Yeah I know the flood comes strong. Stand in the flood. (Me too.))
Seriously, Conjunctions/Ninth Letter/Subtropics: these 3 journals get just as much work coming in as anybody, and they all respond often in less than a month.
To everyone: Push the fucking envelope even harder than you do. Be an open node.
Thanks for linking to this post. I read the post and it makes a lot of sense.
Sometimes I don’t respond to writing I like just because I don’t have something cosmic and clever on the tip of my tongue. Yours is a pleasant idea. Thanks.
Indeed. I concur.
The open node/karma idea is great, but what really got my attention was #5, where Butler says, “Don’t be a fuck,” to editors who take forever to respond to submissions. I couldn’t resist clicking over to read the rest of the post and then the 100+ comments. I was curious whether any editors would write to defend their process, etc.
So there’s this guy (there always is, right?) who writes, “i also haven’t responded to any submissions to 3 a.m. magazine for about 8-10 months, but when i became the editor i think i said that i was just going to publish people i know and people who comment on my blog after i click their names and go to their blogs and find something they have posted that i like.”
It probably goes without saying that ‘publishing people he knows’ isn’t spelled out in the submission guidelines over at 3 a.m. He also writes that he once got irritated because a submission (for another magazine he edited) sat on his desk too long and he solved the problem by just ripping it up.
I know: the guy is young and obviously likes to get people’s goats, probably has a whole cyber-field of them he visits to pet regularly, but here’s my question: Does this happen a lot, where a journal only pretends it’s open to everyone?
P.S. The above-mentioned editor did piss me off, but I had to laugh when at the end of his post he mentioned, very un-ironically, that he’s never been able to get any kind of response from fence magazine. The clogged node, illustrated.
I’m following your advice and writing to tell you I like it. I’ll try to response more often to blogs I like, even if I can’t of anything profound.
I am with you on the spirit of being an open node, but I find it really hard to wade through my email in a timely fashion. This is like when I started reading Michael Pollan’s “In Defense of Food” and I cheered because of his common sense advice (he advocates stuff like eating real food, staying away from anything with more than 7 or 8 ingredients, and eating nothing with an ingredient that you can’t pronounce). But then he suggests making every meal a social event, proposing that we go so far as to stop eating our lunch at our desk and I pull up short. How will I read the Brevity blog? Can I be an open lazy node?
Very good way to look at it. I often feel intimidated to say anything to anyone even if it is a simple compliment. Thanks for posting! Hopefully, I’ll get over my insecurities.
Another good way of spreading good karma, I think: ask permission to use the things you distribute. I use quite a few recent pieces that have yet to make their way into books and anthologies, but I’ve only rarely written their authors to mention that fact. Legally, I’m pretty sure the “fair use” part of the copyright code allows small-scale educational distribution, but it’s nice to ask, which gives you the perfect opportunity to write one of them praise letters that Blake mentions (before he gets all redintheface and potty-mouthed).
Hear, hear. Appreciate the link. I aim to be an open node.
Hello word!!!
[…] and I talked briefly about Blake Butler’s fantastic piece at Brevity, in which he coins the terms “an open node” for the person actively engaged in and […]
[…] and I talked briefly about Blake Butler’s fantastic piece at Brevity, in which he coins the terms “an open node” for the person actively engaged in and giving back […]
[…] take stock in lists, but there are a few underrated writers I’d like to call attention to. In an article on literary citizenship, Blake Butler writes about the importance of promoting writers yo…, and that’s exactly what I intend to do here. The writers that follow aren’t the three […]
[…] 27.Dinty Moore, Brevity. […]
[…] 26th, 2011 § Leave a Comment We’ve talked in the past about literary citizenship: the importance of giving back to the world of journals, books, and other literary venues if you […]
[…] semester. And literary journals! There are a bunch of literary journals at the bottom of the list. I want all of my students to become active literary citizens in the vein of Blake Butler, and that means supporting (submitting AND reading) emerging and established literary […]
Cor! ‘Found this note via a link on inktarsia.wordpress.com and now I’m putting into action your suggestion that I say something when I run across a piece that speaks to me. You’re speaking and I’m acting. Thanks.
[…] Rebecca Rasmussen’s blog dedicated to artists and writers. I got a lot of my ideas from this post on the Brevity blog. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Tagged […]
Reblogged this on Literary Citizenship and commented:
It’s important to say this: I didn’t invent the term “literary citizenship.” I first came across it in 2008 when Dinty Moore posted this link from the Brevity blog to Facebook, which linked back to Blake Butler’s blog.
[…] citizenship”—is taken from an article on Brevity magazine’s web site called “Be an Open Node” by Blake Butler. (Apologies for some of the language in that post, but his points are […]
[…] As Blake Butler says: “Push the fucking envelope even harder than you do. Be an open node.“ […]
[…] I first heard the term from Cathy Day, who has a lovely set of guidelines for being a good literary citizen here. She’s even teaching an undergraduate course on the topic and has aggregated what other writers have had to say. For instance, Matt Bell, Anna Leahy, and Blake Butler. […]
I appreciate your candor. Great blog. I will become more of an open node and post. It does take time and effort to write.
[…] Rebecca Rasmussen’s blog dedicated to artists and writers. I got a lot of my ideas from this post on the Brevity […]
This is great advice. My two favorite quotes that with practice I can equip to my life: “When someone asks a question that feels dumb or unnecessary maybe, answer it anyway,” and “Work to take less time.”
[…] citizenship at Ball State University. Day encountered the term on Dinty W. Moore’s post at Brevity. Though I’ve been thinking about literary citizenship for a while, and doing my part when I […]
[…] made this change after reading this post on the Brevity blog. Finally! I had a name for the activity younger writers were engaged […]
[…] Rebecca Rasmussen’s blog dedicated to artists and writers. I got a lot of my ideas from this post on the Brevity […]
Kathleen Rooney directed me to this link after I asked her about how to feel less gross about self-promoting– and I LOVE it, thank you both! It both validates and challenges.
[…] made this change after reading this post on the Brevity blog. Finally! I had a name for the activity younger writers were engaged […]